MCP100 IndexCloud & DevOps
WatchlistFirst-party MCP

StackQL MCP

by StackQL Studios

Updated September 11, 2026

Cloud & DevOpsAccess · Self-hosted

MCP100 verdict

Not currently recommended. Mature cloud-control MCP with unusually strong safety controls, but full cloud infrastructure mutation remains too consequential for Selected.

MCP100 Assessment

Editorial verdict

Mature cloud-control MCP with unusually strong safety controls, but full cloud infrastructure mutation remains too consequential for Selected.

Reviewed September 11, 2026

Task Fit

Mapped

Cloud operations

Trust

Status warning

Editorial trust review has not been completed.

Maintenance

Date unavailable

No dated repository or package update is currently stored.

Popularity

Signals unavailable

No independently comparable adoption metric is currently stored.

Best for

  • Read-only cloud inventory and governed infrastructure queries
  • Teams that can enforce read_only or safe mode with audit logging

Not ideal for

  • Unattended infrastructure mutation without approval and audit
  • Organizations that cannot tightly scope cloud credentials by provider/account

Avoid if

  • You would run full_access with broad cloud credentials
  • You cannot review audit logs or enforce tool allowlists

Trade-offs

  • Default safe/read-only modes materially improve control
  • The same server can still become a powerful cloud control plane when escalated

Evidence scope

Evidence

Current source snapshot

Popularity

No MCP-specific repository metric is stored

No MCP-specific package metric is stored

Stars observation date unavailable · Downloads observation date unavailable

Maintenance

Publisher activity observed September 11, 2026

Current source snapshot

Trust review

Source relationship: First-party MCP

Reviewed September 11, 2026