MCP100 IndexFramework
WatchlistFirst-party MCP

tRPC-Agent-Go

by tRPC Group

Reviewed October 5, 2026

FrameworkSoftware & Technology

Watchlist tracking

Reviewed for relevance and future tracking value.

MCP100 Assessment

Watchlist / Tracking

Why we’re tracking it

Follow Go SDK and protocol-version support as tRPC Agent evolves

Reviewed · Documentation review; complete setup workflow not independently tested

Best fit

Go teams building production agent systems with tools, memory, MCP and multi-agent workflows.

What we know

A Go-native agent framework with LLM agents, graphs, multi-agent collaboration, tools, MCP, memory, retrieval, evaluation and observability.

Maintenance / activity evidence

  • Observed (UTC)codeexecutor/jupyter: delete a started kernel when websocket dialing …

Tracking evidence observed Oct 5, 2026. These dated signals do not establish current maintenance. Reviewed enrichment confidence: high.

Activity source · commits ↗Activity source · releases ↗

Verification gaps / watch-outs

  • Installation and comprehensive security have not been independently audited.
  • Application grants tools/memory/code execution. Writes: Depends on configured tools/code execution.
  • Application/provider-defined
  • Sensitive access: Prompts, Memory, Artifacts, Code
  • A broad agent framework can be given powerful tools and code execution; deployment configuration determines effective risk.
Security source · repository notice ↗

Full authority, access and evidence limits are available in Review context and Access & risk.

Popularity

1,846 repository stars

Stars observed Oct 6, 2026.

All limitations / Review context

Which MCP client and tool patterns does the current Go framework support?

The bounded assessment reviewed the official README, repository notices, security policy path, and security page for known material public-tracking blockers. No such blocker was identified. This is a public-tracking assessment, not an installation safety certification.

  • A broad agent framework can be given powerful tools and code execution; deployment configuration determines effective risk.
  • Application grants tools/memory/code execution.
  • Application/provider-defined
  • Can persist sessions, memory, artifacts and telemetry depending on setup.
  • Reviewed write actions: Depends on configured tools/code execution
  • Sensitive access: Prompts, Memory, Artifacts, Code
  • Installation, client compatibility and comprehensive security have not been independently audited. Authentication and access depend on the configured services.
  • A project-specific SECURITY.md policy was not available at the fetched official path; the review remains limited to published repository notices.
  • No installation, runtime, client matrix, or complete tool-contract audit was performed in this review.
  • The fetched official SECURITY.md path returned HTTP 404; it was not treated as positive evidence.
  • Authentication, tool permissions, code execution and storage are application-defined.

Original activity observations

  • 2026-09-25T11:03:48Z: codeexecutor/jupyter: delete a started kernel when websocket dialing …
Technical identity
github.com/trpc-group/trpc-agent-go
Reviewed resource type
Framework
Repository identity
trpc-group/trpc-agent-go

Evidence & Sources

Evidence basis
Recorded source evidence
Setup runtime verification
Not independently runtime-tested by MCP100 for this setup workflow.

Reviewed · Latest source observation

  • GitHub repository ↗

    trpc-group/trpc-agent-go

    Recorded repository material and project history.

  • Evidence source ↗

    trpc-group.github.io/trpc-agent-go/

    Source material retained for this review.

    Includes references whose attribution is not established.