MCP100 IndexMCP Server
WatchlistRepository

TrueMemory

by github.com/buildingjoshbetter

Reviewed October 10, 2026

MCP Server

Watchlist tracking

Reviewed for relevance and future tracking value.

MCP100 Assessment

Watchlist / Tracking

Why we’re tracking it

Monitor this implementation for changes in adoption, MCP interface, maintenance and permission boundary.

Reviewed · Documentation review; complete setup workflow not independently tested

Best fit

Store and recall AI assistant context locally

What we know

The memory your AI should have had from the start. Automatic capture, automatic recall, 100% local. One SQLite file, zero cloud. Works with Claude Code, Claude CLI, Cursor, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI. Store and recall AI assistant context locally.

Maintenance / activity evidence

  • GitHub REST pushed_at 2026-10-09T20:21:59Z

Tracking evidence observed Oct 10, 2026. These dated signals do not establish current maintenance. Reviewed enrichment confidence: medium.

Verification gaps / watch-outs

  • Installation and comprehensive security have not been independently audited.
  • Scoped by connected account, local OS, and configuration; verify exact permissions before installation. Reported action classes: persist memories; delete memories (not verified). Complete write authority is not verified.
  • Local storage path and MCP client
  • Local memories and workspace text
  • Local-first privacy claim is project-reported, not verified via network audit. Persistent memory may contain secrets.

Full authority, access and evidence limits are available in Review context and Access & risk.

Popularity

380 repository stars

Stars observed Oct 9, 2026.

Repository total for buildingjoshbetter/TrueMemory.

All limitations / Review context

Has TrueMemory changed its specific MCP integration, install method or privilege scope, and does it justify shortlist promotion?

High-impact permissions explicitly documented; no known blocker to an accurately caveated public Radar listing in limited first-party review.

  • Local-first privacy claim is project-reported, not verified via network audit. Persistent memory may contain secrets.
  • Scoped by connected account, local OS, and configuration; verify exact permissions before installation.
  • Local storage path and MCP client
  • Local memories and workspace text
  • Reviewed write actions: persist memories; delete memories (not verified)
  • Complete write authority is not verified.
  • Installation, client compatibility and comprehensive security have not been independently audited. Authentication and access depend on the configured services.
  • No exhaustive advisory or runtime review performed; never infer installation safety.
  • Write actions/tool inventory not confirmed against exact tool documentation; listed action classes remain illustrative or context-dependent. Empty inventory does not establish read-only.
  • Setup and runtime permissions are implementation- and account-specific; follow linked upstream documentation.
  • Repository pushed_at explicitly observed

Original activity observations

  • GitHub REST pushed_at 2026-10-09T20:21:59Z
Technical identity
github.com/buildingjoshbetter/TrueMemory
Reviewed resource type
MCP Server
Repository identity
buildingjoshbetter/TrueMemory

Evidence & Sources

Evidence basis
Recorded source evidence
Setup runtime verification
Not independently runtime-tested by MCP100 for this setup workflow.

Reviewed · Latest source observation