Watchlist tracking
Reviewed for relevance and future tracking value.
MCP100 Assessment
Watchlist / Tracking
Why we’re tracking it
Track debugger-version and analysis-tool changes because debugging capabilities are specialized
Reviewed · Documentation review; complete setup workflow not independently tested
Best fit
Authorized Windows debugging and reverse-engineering workflows.
What we know
A native MCP plugin exposing x64dbg breakpoints, stepping, memory/register access and PE analysis over HTTP.
Maintenance / activity evidence
- Observed (UTC)v1.5: Win7/8 compat — runtime DPI resolution, unit tests + CI
Tracking evidence observed Oct 5, 2026. These dated signals do not establish current maintenance. Reviewed enrichment confidence: high.
Verification gaps / watch-outs
- Installation and comprehensive security have not been independently audited.
- Debugger/process authority. Writes: Breakpoints; Memory writes; Allocation; Stepping.
- Mandatory bearer token
- Sensitive access: Process memory, Registers, Binaries
- Remote debugger control can alter process execution and memory; use only on authorized targets and keep the endpoint private.
Full authority, access and evidence limits are available in Review context and Access & risk.
Popularity
2,309 repository stars
Stars observed Oct 6, 2026.
All limitations / Review context
Which x64dbg operations and Windows versions remain supported?
The bounded assessment reviewed the official README, repository notices, security policy path, and security page for known material public-tracking blockers. No such blocker was identified. This is a public-tracking assessment, not an installation safety certification.
- Remote debugger control can alter process execution and memory; use only on authorized targets and keep the endpoint private.
- Debugger/process authority.
- Mandatory bearer token
- Target process memory and binary state are exposed.
- Reviewed write actions: Breakpoints; Memory writes; Allocation; Stepping
- Sensitive access: Process memory, Registers, Binaries
- Installation, client compatibility and comprehensive security have not been independently audited. Authentication and access depend on the configured services.
- A project-specific SECURITY.md policy was not available at the fetched official path; the review remains limited to published repository notices.
- No installation, runtime, client matrix, or complete tool-contract audit was performed in this review.
- The fetched official SECURITY.md path returned HTTP 404; it was not treated as positive evidence.
- Windows/x64dbg-specific.
- Full debugger and process-memory access is high impact.
Original activity observations
- 2026-09-30T07:13:46Z: v1.5: Win7/8 compat — runtime DPI resolution, unit tests + CI
Technical identity
github.com/duty1g/x64dbg-mcp-server- Exact implementation source
- https://github.com/duty1g/x64dbg-mcp-server ↗
- Reviewed resource type
- Testing / Debugging
- Repository identity
- duty1g/x64dbg-mcp-server
- Service endpoint
- http://localhost:9094/
Evidence & Sources
- Evidence basis
- Recorded source evidence
- Setup runtime verification
- Not independently runtime-tested by MCP100 for this setup workflow.
Reviewed · Latest source observation
- GitHub repository ↗
duty1g/x64dbg-mcp-server
Recorded repository material and project history.
Setup · Watchlist
Testing / Debugging setup
Publisher instructions.
Source evidence observed .
Additional setup details required — see the specific gaps below.
Install / connect
Publisher instructionsPublisher-specific setup path. Follow prerequisites, then register or connect to your MCP host.
Connection / UI instruction · Publisher instructions
Download x64dbg MCP plugin from https://github.com/duty1g/x64dbg-mcp-server/releases and copy dist/ contents to x64dbg root.Configure / authenticate
Publisher instructionsStart x64dbg. Streamable HTTP at http://localhost:9094/ (x64) or 9095 (x32), with generated Bearer token in request header. Prefer 127.0.0.1 binding.
Advanced configuration · Generic JSON MCP client · Publisher instructions
Generic JSON MCP client · Publisher instructions
{ "mcpServers": { "x64dbg": { "headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer REPLACE_WITH_GENERATED_TOKEN" }, "type": "http", "url": "http://localhost:9094/" } } }Check connection
Suggested checkCheck client MCP tool discovery using the generated token; unauthorized requests get 401. Do not write process memory in verification.
Remove / uninstall / revoke
MCP100 setup guideDisconnect the HTTP MCP entry; close x64dbg or disable/remove plugin from its plugin directory to stop the local server.
MCP100 client-scope guidance: each CLI removal example targets only its named client and exact registered entry. Package names, Desktop/Cursor configuration keys and Codex/Claude registration names may differ; use the entry you actually registered. Client removal does not revoke provider credentials.
claude mcp remove x64dbg
Official Documentation & Sources
What it does
A native MCP plugin exposing x64dbg breakpoints, stepping, memory/register access and PE analysis over HTTP.
- Capability
- Security & Testing
- Resource type
- Testing / Debugging
- Industry
- Cybersecurity
- Best fit
- Authorized Windows debugging and reverse-engineering workflows.
Representative uses
- Set breakpoints and step execution
- Read/write process memory
- Inspect modules/symbols/PE structures
- Dump debugging artifacts
Limitations
- Windows/x64dbg-specific.
- Full debugger and process-memory access is high impact.
Reviewed access
Access & risk
Review the exact access boundary before connecting this MCP to accounts, credentials, or sensitive data.
- Authentication
- Mandatory bearer token
- Permissions
- Debugger/process authority.
- Data handling
- Target process memory and binary state are exposed.
- Cost
- free
- Risk and cautions
- Remote debugger control can alter process execution and memory; use only on authorized targets and keep the endpoint private.
Access scope and cautions
- Write actions
- Breakpoints Memory writes Allocation Stepping
- Sensitive access
- Process memory Registers Binaries
- Risk level
- high
FAQ
Based on reviewed evidence as of 2026-10-06. Watchlist tracking is not a recommendation or a security certification.
Which tasks are documented for this implementation?
What setup and authentication are documented?
Can it modify data or perform write operations?
What data-handling boundary should I consider?
What limitations and risks should I check before use?
Is this an official MCP?
duty1g is listed as Community implementation in MCP100’s current evidence.