Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Open canonical comparison link

Comparable alternatives

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence fieldAtlassian Remote MCPMCP100 RecommendedHubSpot MCPMCP100 Recommended
Task fit
Best for
  • Searching and summarizing Jira and Confluence knowledge
  • Creating and updating Jira work items or Confluence content with approval
  • Connecting supported AI clients to Atlassian Cloud without self-hosting a server
  • Querying CRM records, activities, marketing content, and organizational context
  • Creating or updating supported CRM records and activities with confirmation
  • Building managed AI workflows around HubSpot account data
Not ideal for
  • Atlassian Server or Data Center deployments
  • Organizations that do not allow enterprise content to pass through an external AI client
  • Headless use when organization administrators do not permit API-token authentication
  • Clients that do not support OAuth 2.1 with PKCE
  • Vector or semantic CRM search, which the documented backend does not provide
Avoid when
  • The AI client is not approved for the Jira, Confluence, Bitbucket, Compass, or connected third-party data involved
  • Existing Atlassian user permissions are too broad for agent use
  • Write and bulk actions cannot require review
  • Existing HubSpot user permissions are broader than the intended agent workflow
  • CRM or communication records cannot be shared with the chosen AI client
  • Record creation, email logging, or meeting actions cannot require human approval
Provenance
Provenance details

First-party MCP

Atlassian · Publisher source ↗

First-party MCP

HubSpot · Publisher source ↗

Maintenance
Maintenance details

Repo: Not documented

Package: Not documented

Repo: Not documented

Package: Not documented

Popularity evidence
Client coverage
Client coverage details
Claude Code✓ Streamable HTTP
Claude Desktop✓ Streamable HTTP
Codex✓ Streamable HTTP
VS Code✓ Streamable HTTP
Cursor✓ Streamable HTTP
OpenCode✓ Streamable HTTP
Claude Code✓ Streamable HTTP
Claude Desktop✓ Streamable HTTP
Codex✓ Streamable HTTP
VS Code✓ Streamable HTTP
Cursor✓ Streamable HTTP
OpenCode✓ Streamable HTTP
Client coverage noteLocal stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
AuthenticationOAuth 2.1 browser authorization is the default and recommended method. Admin-enabled, scoped personal API tokens support headless use and are required for Jira Service Management and Bitbucket Cloud tools; Compass tools require OAuth.OAuth 2.1 with PKCE is required. A HubSpot MCP auth app supplies client ID, client secret, and registered redirect URL; the user selects an account and grants available permissions.
CostThe core connection has no separately stated MCP fee. Users need applicable Atlassian Cloud products and an AI client. Beta tools are currently free; Atlassian says some may later be billed in Rovo credits with notice, and Teamwork Graph calls are expected to consume credits at general availability.HubSpot documents the remote MCP server as generally available to all HubSpot accounts without a separate MCP fee. HubSpot subscription features, API limits, integration hosting, and AI-client costs still apply.
PermissionsTools are grouped by product and read, write, or search intent. Organization admins grant or revoke permission groups, and calls also honor the connected user's Jira, Confluence, Jira Service Management, Bitbucket, Compass, project, space, IP-allowlist, and OAuth or API-token scopes.Read and write availability is governed by the MCP app's granted scopes together with the connected user's HubSpot permissions. Supported actions can include CRM records, activities, marketing content, and selected mutations; do not describe access as an over-specific universal intersection beyond those app scopes and user permissions.
Data handlingThe Atlassian-hosted server retrieves and returns authorized Atlassian Cloud content to the external MCP client. Teamwork Graph tools can aggregate relationships across Atlassian products and connected third-party apps and may use AI processing. Traffic uses HTTPS/TLS, and Atlassian records tool-use events in the organization audit log.HubSpot's hosted MCP service relays authorized CRM and activity data to the MCP client. Sensitive Data accounts block activity objects through MCP. Client credentials, OAuth tokens, retrieved records, and tool results must be protected by the integrating application.
Limitations
Tradeoffs
  • The hosted service honors existing product permissions and provides audit events, but it can expose broad enterprise knowledge to the connected AI client.
  • OAuth 2.1 is recommended; API tokens support headless workflows but require admin enablement and careful scope management.
  • Some Teamwork Graph and search tools are Beta and may later consume paid Rovo credits.
  • Rovo MCP v2 adds additional supported Atlassian apps through a documented upgrade path; v1 remains documented and is not described as shut down.
  • The GA hosted service removes local server maintenance but requires creation and management of an MCP auth app.
  • Available scopes follow current server tools and user-granted permissions; newly added scopes can require reauthorization.
  • HubSpot blocks activity objects through MCP when Sensitive Data is enabled, reducing exposure but also capability.
Risk contextThe integration can read and modify enterprise work and knowledge across several Atlassian products. Approve client domains, use least privilege, restrict permission groups and token scopes, retain write confirmation, review audit logs, and evaluate the external AI client's data policy. This review does not claim MCP100 execution testing.CRM and activity tools can expose personal and commercially sensitive data or create consequential customer records and communications. Use a dedicated auth app, narrow user permissions, secure PKCE and token storage, re-review scope changes, and confirm mutations. No MCP100 execution testing is claimed.
Evidence date
Editorial review2026-09-052026-07-24
Candidate evidence2026-09-24T04:25:05.554391Z2026-09-24T04:25:05.554391Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →