Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Open canonical comparison link

Comparable alternatives

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence fieldmonday.com MCPMCP100 SelectedServiceNow MCP ServerMCP100 Selected
Task fit
Best for
  • Connect compatible AI clients to monday.com's documented MCP capabilities.
  • Connect compatible AI clients to ServiceNow's documented MCP capabilities.
Not ideal for
  • Users who need a fully reviewed MCP100 recommendation today
  • Users who need a fully reviewed MCP100 recommendation today
Avoid when
  • Permissions, credentials, and connected data cannot be tested with least privilege
  • Permissions, credentials, and connected data cannot be tested with least privilege
Provenance
Provenance details

First-party MCP

monday.com · Publisher source ↗

First-party MCP

ServiceNow · Publisher source ↗

Maintenance
Maintenance details

Repo: Not documented

Package: Not documented

Repo: Not documented

Package: Not documented

Popularity evidence
Client coverage
Client coverage details
Claude Code✓ Streamable HTTP
Claude Desktop✓ Streamable HTTP
Codex✓ Streamable HTTP
VS Code✓ Streamable HTTP
Cursor✓ Streamable HTTP
OpenCode✓ Streamable HTTP
Claude Code✓ Streamable HTTP
Claude Desktop✓ Streamable HTTP
Codex✓ Streamable HTTP
VS Code✓ Streamable HTTP
Cursor✓ Streamable HTTP
OpenCode✓ Streamable HTTP
Client coverage noteLocal stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
AuthenticationFollow only the publisher source; credential storage, scopes, and revocation remain under review.Follow only the publisher source; credential storage, scopes, and revocation remain under review.
CostPublisher plans, API usage, infrastructure, or per-action charges may apply; MCP100 has not published a cost conclusion.Publisher plans, API usage, infrastructure, or per-action charges may apply; MCP100 has not published a cost conclusion.
PermissionsExact permissions and read/write boundaries have not completed MCP100 review.Exact permissions and read/write boundaries have not completed MCP100 review.
Data handlingCandidate-specific retention, subprocess, telemetry, and model-data behavior remain review items.Candidate-specific retention, subprocess, telemetry, and model-data behavior remain review items.
Limitations
Tradeoffs
  • Publisher attribution supports discovery, but does not replace an independent permissions and usability review.
  • Publisher attribution supports discovery, but does not replace an independent permissions and usability review.
Risk contextUse a test account, least privilege, read-only controls where available, and explicit approval for mutations.Use a test account, least privilege, read-only controls where available, and explicit approval for mutations.
Evidence date
Editorial review2026-07-242026-07-24
Candidate evidence2026-07-30T19:00:00.000Z2026-07-30T19:00:00.000Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →