Field-by-field comparison
Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.
Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.
| Evidence field | Zoom Workspace MCPShortlist candidate | ServiceNow MCP ServerMCP100 Recommended |
|---|---|---|
| Task fit | ||
| Best for |
|
|
| Not ideal for |
|
|
| Avoid when |
|
|
| Provenance | ||
| Provenance details | First-party MCP Zoom · Publisher source ↗ | First-party MCP ServiceNow · Publisher source ↗ |
| Maintenance | ||
| Maintenance details | Repo: Not documented Package: Not documented | Repo: Not documented Package: Not documented |
| Popularity evidence | ||
| Shared repository stars | 3 Shared repository stars (not MCP-specific) · checked 2026-10-20 | Not documented |
| Client coverage | ||
| Client coverage details | Not documented | Claude Code✓ Streamable HTTP Claude Desktop✓ Streamable HTTP Codex✓ Streamable HTTP VS Code✓ Streamable HTTP Cursor✓ Streamable HTTP OpenCode✓ Streamable HTTP |
| Client coverage note | Local stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server. | |
| Access and data | ||
| Authentication | OAuth 2.1 with PKCE, as documented for Zoom's MCP platform. | Follow only the publisher source; credential storage, scopes, and revocation remain under review. |
| Cost | No separate Workspace MCP fee is documented. Zoom Workplace has a free Basic plan and paid plans; product entitlements and limits depend on the account plan. | Publisher plans, API usage, infrastructure, or per-action charges may apply; MCP100 has not published a cost conclusion. |
| Permissions | The Workspace MCP exposes access according to the connected Zoom account and granted Workspace scopes. The current Workspace tool surface includes read operations plus reservation create/update/delete actions. | Exact permissions and read/write boundaries have not completed MCP100 review. |
| Data handling | Not documented in the reviewed sources. The reviewed Zoom Workspace MCP documentation does not state an MCP-specific retention or training policy. | Candidate-specific retention, subprocess, telemetry, and model-data behavior remain review items. |
| Limitations | ||
| Tradeoffs |
|
|
| Risk context | Reservation tools can create, update, or delete workspace reservations. Calendar/contact/location data may also be exposed to the connected client within the user's authorized scope. | Use a test account, least privilege, read-only controls where available, and explicit approval for mutations. ServiceNow AI Gateway can provide an additional governance layer where it is configured; it is not intrinsic to every out-of-the-box MCP server. |
| Evidence date | ||
| Editorial review | 2026-10-19 | 2026-07-24 |
| Candidate evidence | 2026-10-20 | 2026-09-24T04:25:05.554391Z |
Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.
Read the evidence method →